Brian! [Member Since: November 07 '07]

I write Atomic Robo.

Our newest series is Atomic Robo and the Dogs of War.

Blurbs

Rugdog says:

hey man. I’ve been wanting to get yer book so I bought the vol 1 graphic novel to give it a shot!

BillyMC says:

Atomic Robo has made it to my all time fave list.

Chris says:

Great Post! Especially From my position as an indie creator and as a retailer, the problem appears to be that there’s too many of the wrong kind of reader. I’m talking about the lifers who stick to Marvel and/or DC. People who routinely shell out $50+ per week on books they don’t even really enjoy, but who are afraid they might “waste” $3 on something they “might” not like when they acknowledge to throwing away $50+ on books they largely dislike I hope you guys continue to have success critically, and hopefully commercially. As for me, as long as there is Atomic Robo I will be buying it.

Robert says:

And it still wasn’t earning enough to be self-sufficient. Let me be absolutely clear on this point: Red 5 Comics made Volume 2 possible. Without their support, I’d have long since gone bankrupt and there’d be no new Robo comics for you.

Man, that’s scary. : (

Robert says:

I picked up Atomic Robo on a whim when issue 4 was out. Really enjoyed it, and love to see the fabulous work continued in the new volume.

Keep ‘em flyin’ and I’ll keep buyin’.

CommonWriter says:

Hooray! Dogs of War begins. Just as good as the first series so far! Thanks.

BeetleBooster says:

Loved Robo, loved the humor especially. I’m really looking forward to Dogs of War. Keep up the good work! :-)

-b. says:

As part of my massive catch-up (65 comics!!!), I’m getting Atomic Robo 1-6. Looking forward to it! I read the first issue and it was terrific. Thanks!

MadMikeyD says:

FCBD was my introduction to Atomic Robo, and I loved it! I need to get myself caught up.

El Dorado says:

Hey Brian, I loved the FCBD story. I picked up the first three issues of Robo a while back and really enjoyed them as well. Looking foward to catching up on them when the trade comes out and also excited about new ongoing series.

Nicholas says:

Hey I just started reading Atomic Robo and so far I’m loving it! I LOL’d so hard at the prank Stephen Hawking pulled on Robo. I think I’m going to have to add your book to my subscriptions. Keep up the good work.

Robert says:

Dang, I wish I had checked nuklearpower before I went to go see Superhero Movie. I completely missed seeing Atomic Robo. Then again, it’s probably a good thing that Atomic Robo won’t be directly associated with that movie, cause it was pretty bad. I can understand why the occasional poop/fart joke can be funny, but that’s a good majority of the movie right there. That and a whole scene of animals humping.

daynah says:

Sorry, by people I’d rather see interviewed, I meant more than myself. :)

Dan says:

Atomic Robo gets a nice mention in an aside here

Robert says:

I will agree that USM is most definitely the best Ultimate series. UXM comes in a close 2nd. The problem is when they do crossovers between the two. The crossovers themselves aren’t a problem, they’re very enjoyable to read. The problem is that it creates timeline anomalies. Whenever the X-Men are featured in USM, there’s no possible way to fit it into the UXM timeline (they are very busy people).

Robert says:

Your newest blog entry made me think about the Marvel Ultimate universe; essentially a completely rebooted universe in order to get rid of the ‘cache’ that caused continuity errors. Despite their best intentions, they already have a bunch of inconsistencies (The biggest offender is the “Ultimate Team-Up” series). Most of them are relatively minute, but could have easily been prevented. Nothing profound here, just something that came to mind.

e.g. johnson says:

You’re The Smart

-e

Brian! said:

Yeah, I'm stupid and only figured out how to friend people, like, yesterday :D
e.g. johnson says: Hey. Just letting you know that the only problem I've been having with the issues I've seen is that they are too damn short. =) But then I've always had that "need more!" issue with your writing. -e
Mr. Squeekers says: DANGER: BLURB Mr. Clevinger, while I have not picked up Atomic Robo (something I hope to remedy). I am a huge fan of 8 Bit Theater and Nuklear Age, and I eagerly await Atomic Age. P.S. I miss Angus.
Todd Michael R. says: So Brian, as a published writer, why don't you come bang the pots and pans around in the I AM A WRITER thread? http://heavyink.com/forum/forums/1/topics/28?page=1#posts-333 (sigh) I'll go buy your comic.
MD says: "...And now .I'm. wondering how much of what he'd pay winds-up back in his own pocket. :)"

Worst. Investment. Plan. Ever.
blue_j says: ...And now .I'm. wondering how much of what he'd pay winds-up back in his own pocket. :)
MD says: "Way to subscribe to your own comic!"

I'm just wondering if he still has to pay for it...
Brian! says: Hey, it's a title I suggest everyone read just like my other subscriptions :)
Todd Michael R. says: Way to subscribe to your own comic!
Tyler says: Hey. Thanks for signing up. I'm a big fan of the comic.

Some Simple Rules

by Brian! at 06:24 PM on February 10, 2008 18:24

Most people who work in comics are comics fans. It only makes sense. I mean, you don’t become a auto mechanic if you hate cars. And this is what’s wrong with most comics. They’re written and drawn by people who think comics are doin’ just fine. If Atomic Robo has any kind of advantage, it’s that its co-creators kind of hate comics.

See, Scott and I collected comics in the early ‘90s because that’s when we were stupid teenagers. The state of the industry and the benchmark for quality in those days eventually pissed us off and we both gave up on comics. It would be years before we’d come back to them, and it would be a slow and grudging effort.

We enjoy the idea of comics and take great pleasure in a number of titles from a number of companies and creators, so maybe it’s unfair to say that we “hate” comics. More accurately, we hate the reality of the state of American comics today; what comics have become in an overall gestalt sense; what people come to expect out of a comic. We see so many titles making the same mistakes that pushed us away from comics in the ‘90s, and the tragedy is that these are wholly unnecessary elements and easily remedied. But it feels like no one ever does.

So, when we were brainstorming on what we wanted Atomic Robo to be, we came up with a list of rules. It was nothing formal, but things would come up in conversation, like:

“Man, I hate it when comics do X.”

“I know! Let’s never do that.”

“Agreed.”

So, a little while ago, I put together a list of things that Team Robo guarantees you’ll never see in one of our comics.

In no particular order, Team Robo promises you:

No angst: Loading characters up with angst was a revolutionary move on the part of Marvel Comics back in the ‘60s. I haven’t looked at a calendar today, but that was four decades ago. There are other emotions and motivations available to characters. Atomic Robo is not a comic that will be 100% sunshine and jokes, it would idiotic to portray a complicated life of 80+ years as a nonstop party with scientists, but we aren’t going to delve into melodrama either. You are not going to see Robo mope about his lack of emotions, or pine to be human, or throw a tantrum over daddy issues, or whatever childish nonsense passes for characterization in most comics these days.

No “cheesecake”: This is nothing more than Scott and I having the audacity to treat women like human beings. I mean, come on, 99 times out of a 100, there is no reason at all to frame a panel from the perspective of a girl’s ass. Grow up already.

No reboots: They’re frustrating, unnecessary, and a jarring reminder that all fiction is a thinly veiled series of lies. The major events of Robo’s lifetime were plotted years before we worked on the first page of the first issue. Anything Scott and I add to that has to fit organically into the existing framework. If it doesn’t fit as naturally as if it’d been there all along, then we skip it and move to the next idea. This is a much better solution than making a deal that the character would never make with the devil he’d never deal with to change “one” thing that alters the entire universe in ways that no one in charge seems to fully comprehend or address. Ahem. Everything that happens will fit into the larger mythos; everything that happens will happen for a reason; and nothing that happens can be “undone.”

No filler: This one’s pretty simple. Why should we devote a month of our short lives to creating an issue if it isn’t worth reading? And then why should we try to sell you an issue that isn’t worth buying? The main source of filler issues seems to be due to moving set pieces from the aftermath of one event to set up the next one. Since we have no reason to follow Robo’s life as a linear chain of events, we’re free to jump straight from one adventure to the next. Maybe Robo fights a sea monster. Maybe we follow the lives of Action Scientists when off duty. But it ain’t filler.

No delays: This one’s even simpler. The industry’s gotten so bad about delays that they have become the norm. No one is surprised any more when a comic is delayed. And when a comic has no delays, there’s that unspoken “yet” or “in a while” tacked at the end. Red 5 Comics was constantly praised, praised, merely for delivering books on time. What kind of industry is this? Think about it for a minute. Imagine if you were lauded by co-workers and supervisors just for showing up to work on time. It’s ridiculous. We could make more money if we gave you 12 issues a year, but we take a break between each mini-series to build up a buffer on the next one. We’d rather deliver nine issues a year exactly on time than promise you twelve issues and deliver one of them late.

Pick up any Big Two title and you’ve got a 50% chance of finding one, some, or all of those rules broken between its covers. Pick it up for a year, and it’s a 90% chance. This is what’s wrong with comics today. I mean, honestly. What kind of maladjust goes out of his way to read melodramatic borderline misogynist stories with incomprehensible continuities that constantly shift when there’s a story at all if it shows up on time?

It’s not that people don’t like what mainstream comics are about. NBC’s Heroes proved that. So it’s got to be something else. Do you really think Heroes would’ve taken off if every scene involving Claire or Nikki was shot at ass- or boob-level? If the events of previous episodes changed with every new episode? If the show occasionally aired an hour, or a day, or six weeks late?

You can blame cable television, and DVDs, home entertainment systems, and PC and console games for the decline of comics readership. I don’t doubt for one second that those contribute to the problem. But, maybe, just maybe, people sought other forms of entertainment because it is a rare comic that treats itself or its readers with respect.